Learn with Phoebe Β· Visual Thinking & Storytelling

Learn Visual Storytelling with Phoebe

Here is a deck where every chart is correct, every number checks out, and the recommendation is never acted on. The finding is on slide five of five, behind 142 words of setup and nine separate claims. Then somebody asks for a bit of context at the front, and the point moves to slide six of six behind 203 words. Six sessions on the part that happens after the analysis is right: the one sentence, the order, and what to make loud.

6sessions
142words before the point
33after four levers
4things measured live
45min per session

The six sessions 🎯 · one claim, all the way through

The running situation is Daybreak's Guji churn problem - a real finding, correctly analysed, badly told. The coffee-subscription company from the SQL, system-design, product-design, communication, course-design and dataviz courses. Same claim every session, so the only thing that changes is what you did with it.

easy - everyone medium hands-on bench night

Your passport 🎫

Clear all three quiz questions in a session and it gets stamped. Six stamps means nothing you send goes out without a sentence and a measured order. Stamps live in this browser only.

What this course is not, so you land in the right place 🧭

If your question isGo here instead
Which encoding does this question need, and is the chart honest?learn-dataviz-with-phoebe
How do I make the ask, listen first, or deliver bad news?learn-communication-with-phoebe
How do I read a metric and question it?learn-data-literacy-with-phoebe
How do I design a session people learn from?learn-course-design-with-phoebe
The charts are right. How do I turn them into something that changes a decision?you are in the right place

Session 6 is about the story changing shape, not the chart. How a chart survives a slide, a doc, a phone and a printer is learn-dataviz-with-phoebe session 6, and two courses owning one subject disagree with each other eventually.

Choose your path πŸ—ΊοΈ

Three doors into the same conviction: the analysis being right is the easy half, and almost nobody measures the other half.

⏱️ I present tomorrow 1β†’ 2 write the sentence, put it first, and cut what does not serve it
πŸ”¦ My deck is right and nobody acts on it 3β†’ 4β†’ 5 one idea each, one loud thing, then measure the order
🎯 The whole thing 1β†’ 2β†’ 3β†’ 4β†’ 5β†’ 6 from a sentence to four tellings of it

What is honest here 🧾

The bench in session 5 reads its numbers back out of the rendered slides. One figure is a model, and it says so on the widget itself.

ClaimStatus
Where the point landsReally measured. The index of the slide carrying the conclusion, found in the rendered deck after it is drawn
Words before the pointReally measured from the rendered text of every slide up to and including the point. Titles, claims and body text all counted
Distinct claims and labelled visualsReally counted in the DOM. If a lever silently failed to change the deck, these report the truth rather than the intention
Time to the pointA model, labelled as one on the widget: words at 160 wpm plus 15 seconds a slide. Both constants are stated and neither is a finding
Daybreak's numbersA teaching situation. The measurement code is real

The knowledge map 🧠

The whole course at a glance - hover a session to spotlight its concepts, click any node to jump in.