Learn with Phoebe ยท Applied AI

Learn When AI with Phoebe

Six sessions, 45 minutes each, on the most underrated skill in the AI era: routing. Which work goes to a dashboard, which to classic ML, which genuinely deserves the tokens - and what each choice really costs once evals, monitoring and cleanup enter the price. Built on a live ten-workload backlog with real published prices. Do not use a nuclear weapon to kill a mosquito: the mosquito dies either way, and now you also have a crater to explain.

6sessions
$2,315true cost, unrouted
$416true cost, routed
10/10 answers trusted
45min per session

The six sessions ๐ŸŽฏ ยท one routing playbook, built across all of them

Bring your team's real backlog. Each session adds one routing rule; by session 6 all five run live against Cadence's ten workloads, and then against yours.

easy - everyone medium hands-on capstone

Your passport ๐ŸŽซ

Clear all three quiz questions in a session and it gets stamped. Stamps live in this browser only.

Choose your path ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ

Three doors into the same discipline: the tool is chosen by the work, never the other way round.

๐Ÿ’ผ I approve the AI budget 1โ†’ 5โ†’ 6 the test, the honest number, then the playbook
๐Ÿ”ง I route my own work every day 2โ†’ 3โ†’ 4 each tier's genuine home ground, one session each
๐ŸŽฏ The whole journey 1โ†’ 2โ†’ 3โ†’ 4โ†’ 5โ†’ 6 from tool-first habit to a routing playbook you can defend

What is real here ๐Ÿงพ

A course about honest costing owes you an unusually precise account of its own numbers.

ClaimStatus
The dashboard answers in the simulatorReal. Computed live in your browser from the embedded 168-day dataset when you route a workload there
The LLM answers in the simulatorA deterministic teaching model of documented failure modes, labelled as such on the widget. It calls no API
Every priceOfficial published rates, dated September 2026: Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10 per million tokens, BigQuery on-demand at $6.25 per TiB
The 95 percent pilot statisticMIT Project NANDA, taught with its own author's correction: a learning gap in organizations, not model failure - and not peer-reviewed
The 80 percent project-failure figureRAND cites external estimates; what RAND measured is the ranked root causes, led by leaders misunderstanding the problem
Trees beat deep learning on tabular dataScoped honestly: typical, medium-sized tabular data, per Grinsztajn et al. and the follow-up benchmark literature

The knowledge map ๐Ÿง 

The whole course at a glance - hover a session to spotlight its concepts, click any node to jump in.