The six sessions π¬ Β· one real deck, built across all of them
Pick a deck you genuinely have to present in the next month. Not a practice deck. Every session moves that one forward, and the order is deliberate, because the mistakes compound backwards: people design slides before they have an argument, and then no amount of design saves it.
The 30-second test
Thirty seconds after your slide goes up, can the room say what you are asking for? Meet the test, watch a real slide climb from 27 percent understood to 91, and learn the method that has actual research behind it.
π§± Session 2 Β· easyOutline first
Your deck is an argument. Generate the structure, then kill half of it. Why every good AI deck tool puts an editable outline gate in front of you, and why the bad ones skip straight to slides.
π― Session 3 Β· mediumSlides that carry
Assertion-evidence in full: a sentence headline that states the message, one visual that proves it. One idea per slide, one hero number, and the three Mayer principles that decide whether any of it lands.
π Session 4 Β· mediumCharts and data
Charts that argue instead of decorate, and where fabricated figures actually come from. Microsoft says Copilot is not optimised for verbatim reproduction of large inputs. That sentence is why your number drifted.
π οΈ Session 5 Β· hands-onBuild the deck
The real build, tool by tool, with the licence and export traps named: Copilot needs a Designer licence for half its features, Gamma flattens gradients, Canva warns your PPTX may not survive PowerPoint. Plus a course still selling a tool that no longer exists.
π£οΈ Session 6 Β· hands-onThe room
Speaker notes, the Q and A you are dreading, and the accessibility pass no AI tool will do for you. This is where the last nine points of the score live, and no vendor claims WCAG conformance for its output.
Your passport π«
Clear all three quiz questions in a session and it gets stamped. Four stamps unlocks the accessibility lever in the simulator, which is the only way to reach 91 percent. There is an honest bypass if you would rather skip ahead.
Choose your path πΊοΈ
Three doors into the same conviction: a slide earns a decision, or it is a document that wasted a room's afternoon.
What is honest here π§Ύ
Three things this course will not do, said up front.
| Claim | Status |
|---|---|
| Assertion-evidence beats topic-plus-bullets on comprehension | Peer-reviewed. Garner and Alley 2013, 110 students, significant at p under .01 |
| The 10/20/30 rule is optimal | Convention. Kawasaki's own reasoning, asserted from experience, no study behind it |
| The simulator's comprehension percentage | A teaching model of the research above, not a measurement of your room. The contrast ratio in it is real WCAG maths |
The knowledge map π§
The whole course at a glance - hover a session to spotlight its concepts, click any node to jump in.