Learn with Phoebe Β· Visual Thinking & Storytelling

Learn AI Illustration with Phoebe

Most people who make pictures with a model have one control: the sentence they type. The stack has five layers of control and the sentence is the one with the least grip. A ratio binds. A reference binds by weight. A seed is documented at ninety-nine percent. Every word of the prompt persuades. And every character of lettering the model is asked to spell is a coin it will eventually drop, for a reason that lives in the architecture and not in the version. Six sessions on art direction with image models: where control lives, style written down, composition with a zone kept empty for type, the lettering law on mechanism, consistency as a pipeline, and the evidence for when a generated picture should not be used at all.

6sessions
6assets, one hand
99% what a seed is worth
11characters enough to fail
45min per session

The six sessions 🎯 · one launch set, six decisions

The running job is Daybreak's autumn roast launch set: the coffee-subscription company from the sibling courses needs an email hero, a landing-page header, three social tiles and the printed sleeve, and the six must look like one hand made them. The sleeve carries an origin claim a lawyer signed, which is the first reason no lettering ever comes out of a model here. Every session moves the six assets one decision closer to shipping.

πŸŽ›οΈ Session 1 Β· medium

Where control lives

Five layers of control and one of them is a sentence. Which settings bind, which persuade, the vendor sentences that admit what each cannot do, and a dated control sheet for one asset.

β–Ά Start here
🧬 Session 2 · medium

Style DNA, written down

Six sentences a stranger could act on, including the one about what is absent. Three kinds of reference and what each carries, and a kit of four named files with one job each.

six sentences
πŸ–ΌοΈ Session 3 Β· medium

Composition and the type zone

Six frames at six ratios, each with a third kept empty. Placement lines written only in words a painter could be wrong about, and the composition reference that carries shape and not colour.

the empty third
πŸ”€ Session 4 Β· bench night

The lettering law

The encoder never saw a letter. The research that fixed spelling replaced the encoder, not the prompt; three vendors admit the limit in their docs. A bench reads your brief for the eleven characters that break it, and the fourteen adjectives that make it worse.

β˜… the bench
πŸ” Session 5 Β· hands-on

Consistency is a pipeline

Seed at ninety-nine, style by weight, the Edit Model's four images, the adapter's five GPU hours. No vendor sells identity; the pipeline delivers it, with a person as the last step. One card on rights.

four handles
βš–οΈ Session 6 Β· hands-on

When it earns its place

Plus 19 percent clicks while nobody knows; minus 31.5 when they do; a watermark that erodes trust further. The click evidence and the trust evidence side by side, and a rule for saying no. Final scorecard.

πŸ”’ final scorecard
medium hands-on bench night

Your passport 🎫

Clear all three quiz questions in a session and it gets stamped. Six stamps means you stopped prompting and started art-directing. Stamps live in this browser only.

What this course is not, so you land in the right place 🧭

If your question isGo here instead
Who owns the output, what is copyrightable, where the court cases stand, what a Content Credential proves?learn-ai-design-with-phoebe a4
When must generated content be disclosed, and what do the EU dates require?learn-ai-media-with-phoebe session 6
How do I write a constraint brief for product UI, or use references when drafting screens?learn-ai-design-with-phoebe b2 and b7
How do I generate on-brand images at marketing volume?learn-ai-marketing-with-phoebe b8
How do I art-direct an illustration so it is a picture before it is a style, keeps its type out of the model, matches its siblings, and knows when not to exist?you are in the right place

Session 5 carries one card on rights, the single Copyright Office line the pipeline needs. Everything else in that territory lives with the two owning courses, because two courses owning one body of law disagree with each other eventually.

Choose your path πŸ—ΊοΈ

Three doors into the same conviction: the prompt is the last and weakest of five controls, and art direction is the other four.

⏱️ I have an asset due this week 1β†’ 3β†’ 4 the control sheet, the empty third, and a brief the bench grades good
🧬 It never looks like us twice 2β†’ 5 style as six sentences, then the four handles and the person at the end
🎯 The whole thing 1β†’ 2β†’ 3β†’ 4β†’ 5β†’ 6 from one long prompt to a documented, consistent, defensible set

What is honest here 🧾

The bench in session 4 counts things in the text of a brief against a fixed lexicon you can read in the source. The one-line verdict is a rule of thumb and is labelled as one on the widget. Nothing is generated, anywhere on this site, and the reason is the subject of session 4.

ClaimStatus
Anchors, style words, families, conflicts, quoted characters, refusal, zone, ratio, referencesReally counted in the brief against lexicons in assets/il-live.js; the lists are finite and deliberately so
The verdict lineA heuristic, labelled as one on the widget
Every parameter range, ceiling and vendor admissionRead from the documentation page named, on 2026-09-18, and dated on the page; these move and the date is part of the fact
The image the brief would produceNot judged. The bench measures the one input a person fully controls. A perfect brief can still make a bad picture, and a person with the six sentences decides that
"Model X renders text at Y percent accuracy"Not stated. The widely quoted comparison could not be verified and is excluded rather than repeated
Rights, indemnities, the cases, disclosureOne card, two verbatim Copyright Office lines; everything else points at the owning courses
Daybreak's launch setA teaching situation. The counting code is real

The knowledge map 🧠

The whole course at a glance - hover a session to spotlight its concepts, click any node to jump in.