Learn with Phoebe Β· Visual Thinking & Storytelling

Learn Data Visualization with Phoebe

Here is a chart nobody in the meeting thought was dishonest. The difference between the best and worst roast is 21 percent in the data. The picture shows it as 173 percent. Nobody typed a wrong number - the axis simply does not start at zero, and somebody had asked to make it pop. Six sessions on which encoding a question needs and whether the picture is telling the truth, with a bench that computes all of that from the chart it is currently drawing.

6sessions
21% in the data
173% in the picture
3things measured live
45min per session

The six sessions πŸ“Š Β· one dataset, all the way through

The running dataset is Daybreak's subscription numbers - signups, cancellations, revenue by roast, retention by cohort. The coffee-subscription company from the SQL, system-design, product-design, communication and course-design courses. Same numbers every session, so the only thing that changes is the decision you made about them.

easy - everyone medium hands-on hardest

Your passport 🎫

Clear all three quiz questions in a session and it gets stamped. Six stamps means every chart you make from now on has a job and can be checked. Stamps live in this browser only.

What this course is not, so you land in the right place 🧭

If your question isGo here instead
How do I read a metric and question it?learn-data-literacy-with-phoebe
How do I commission and govern dashboards?learn-business-intelligence-with-phoebe
What does the statistic actually mean?learn-statistics-with-phoebe
How do I turn a set of charts into a story?learn-visual-storytelling-with-phoebe
Which encoding does this question need, and is the picture telling the truth?you are in the right place

Session 6 is deliberately not about dashboards. That is business-intelligence's job, and two courses teaching one subject disagree with each other eventually.

Choose your path πŸ—ΊοΈ

Three doors into the same conviction: most of what makes a chart good is checkable, and almost nobody checks it.

⏱️ I have ninety minutes 2β†’ 3 pick the right shape, then find out whether it is lying
🎨 Somebody said my charts look amateur 4β†’ 5β†’ 6 colour with a job, thin marks, and a chart that survives a phone
πŸ“Š The whole thing 1β†’ 2β†’ 3β†’ 4β†’ 5β†’ 6 from the question to a published chart that can be checked

What is honest here 🧾

Unusually for a course in this estate, almost everything in the signature widget is measured rather than modelled.

ClaimStatus
The lie factorReally measured off the drawn geometry - truncate the axis and the number moves because the rectangles moved. Blunt by design: it compares the largest and smallest item, so a chart can score 1.00 and still mislead by its window or its denominator, which session 3 covers separately
ContrastReally measured. WCAG 2.1, computed on the chart's own text against its own surface
Colour-vision separationA real matrix transform and an OKLab distance - but a simulation of dichromacy, not what a person with that condition sees. Good enough to catch a palette that will fail
The chart paletteThe validated categorical default. Lightness, chroma, CVD separation and normal-vision floor all pass; the contrast warning on two slots is discharged by direct labels, which the chart carries
Daybreak's numbersA teaching dataset. The measurement code is real

The knowledge map 🧠

The whole course at a glance - hover a session to spotlight its concepts, click any node to jump in.